Communication And Critical Thinking Samples †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Communication And Critical Thinking. Answer: Introduction Critical Thinking is the ability of various user to analyze the thinking nature, provide evidence of the ideas. It is a multi step process which can be defined as fast process where an individual can observe , analyze and present their new ideas and add it all into present understanding (Jackson Chapman, 2012). It can be applied in a large number of regions such as reading, written work and discussions. It is a real life model on which people can build more efficient problem solving skills which will ultimately valuable for the organization. It will ultimately improve interpreting skills and problem solving skills (Jackson Chapman, 2012). The ultimate goal is to follow various logical steps and conclude at a particular decision. The important points for decision-making are approach, save time, better communication, decision making and reason(Alsagoff et al., 2012) Approach: With this critical thinking method one can develop awareness about various new techniques of approaching a problem. It minimizes the use of standard problem solving technique(Alsagoff et al., 2012) Save time: Critical analysis help in saving time. It is relevant to know that all the information helps in decision making, on the contrary one can differentiate between relevant and irrelevant ones. Critical analysis helps in setting priority of time and resources by analyzing essentiality of various process (Jackson Chapman, 2012). Improving Communication: It teaches people how to analyze and build evidence for any source. It ultimately aims to produce effective communicator (Jackson Chapman, 2012). Decision making : It mainly works with critical thinking to make it more easier for anyone. A person generally works with more analytics and leaves behind intuition and guesswork (Alsagoff et al., 2012) Reason: It will help to become a more reasoned and appropriate problem solver. One can run two types of reasoning that is inductive and deductive. The usage of the inductive and deductive type depends on its usage. Prioritizing decision in various reasons and logic over emotion or guesswork will ultimately led to effective problem solving (Arends, 2014). Critical Thinking Critical thinking is nothing but a series of multistep process. It is defined as a fast process where people can observe , judge and present new ideas and sum it to current understanding. It can be applied in a variety of platform ranging from reading to discussion (Halpern, 2014). It is not considered as a negative process in spite of the fact that it has critical thinking has many criticism. It is more useful to link critical thinking with various standards and criteria. It can be considered more than a problem which can be used to build successful more efficiently decision making techniques which will ultimately bring benefit to the organization. It is focuses the application of logic for better and reasoned decision making. Many times critical thinking is misjudged as criticism (Kim et al., 2013). It mainly follows a sequential logical step and arrive at a appropriate conclusion. It also involves the evaluation of various sources like data, facts, observed behaviors and research finding. Good thinkers can draw conclusion from a set of data containing information for making a solution of a problem and decision making (Kim et al. ,2013). Some examples of critical thinking are, a plumber who uses critical thinking techniques to judge which material is appropriate for a particular job, similarly a job seekers uses his critical thinking to judge vacancies in various firms and then he decides the suitable organization for his application (Halpern, 2014). Critical thinking is mainly considered as a process of putting questions to data containing important information (Liu, Frankel Roohr, 2014). For example when a student reads the information in a textbook then he can put questions like what a leader or a professor or his classmate says about a particular topic. The word logic is derived from Greek word logike, which means art of reasoning (Halpern, 2014). By using a logic a person can judge what is good or bad for him. It also helps in the distinction of good or bad reasoning, truth and falsehood. By the help of logic one can evaluate new thinkings and to make good decisions (Arends, 2014). List of Critical thinking Analysis: It refers to the ability of judging something and then one can understand its meaning and its representations(Armstrong et al., 2015). Clarification: It not only the ability to summarize information and to state in such a way that it is easily understandable to people (Arends, 2014). Evaluation: These skills are mainly related to accessing or judging the period of an idea (Fairclough, 2014). Explanation: Explanation can be considered similar to clarification and it mainly focuses on the ability to clearly reveal information and even include ones perspective to that particular data containing vital information (Armstrong et al., 2015). Inference: This mainly focuses on the ability bring out conclusion from the information that is provided to the people. Interpretation: It mainly focuses on the understanding of required information. It also infers to communicate the meaning of a information that is clearly understandable by various audiences (Liu, Frankel Roohr, 2014). Judgment: Similar to evaluation, judgment can be considered as an idea or piece of important information (Fairclough, 2014). Objectivity: It mainly focuses on evaluating an idea without biasing it further. Problem Solving: It is an another important technique or skill that can be considered for judging or analyzing of problem, generating a particular solution, its implementation and after that accessing it ( Fairclough, 2014). Reasoning: It refers thinking of a problem or question logically. Importance of teaching critical thinking Critical thinking can be consider as an important skill for fresh graduate to check its necessity in workplace. During their research or study, students should use critical thinking for development of their knowledge. It is also vital for students while making decisions from variety of given choices while choosing activities for development of skill and techniques (Dwyer, Hogan Stewart, 2014). It enables students to take decision to make an output for knowledge, developing techniques which is used by learner and gradually decreases their dependency on other various University. When this type of critical thinking is integrated with current knowledge then it can led to the formation of new ideas and knowledge (Armstrong et al., 2015). Critical thinking plays a key role in the life of other graduate techniques or outcomes of learning such as solving of problem, making of important decision and communication (Dwyer, Hogan Stewart, 2014). Critical thinking should not be misunderstanding with problem solving. Critical thinking is generally considered as an important component of problem solving. Teaching Critical Thinking Critical thinking can be easily taught to people. Teaching of critical thinking mainly involves breaking down of processes. Each step must be explained and practiced which will ultimately benefit the students (Dwyer, Hogan Stewart, 2014). The academic plays a key role as a facilitator to provide students to develop an understanding of critical thinking (McPeck, 2016). Then they must allow students a particular span of time for its practice and to receive feedback from it (Moore, 2013). Technical critical thinking mainly comprises of two parts, firstly providing students a critical thinking process and secondly providing an opportunity to various students for the application of this process. During set up of student task the following points of critical thinking should be considered like it should be enough small to stop its effects on the student, should be non-aggressive like it should not include topics where students are uncomfortable in expressing their point of view (Liu, Frankel Rohr, 2014). Time is generally considered to as an important factor of critical thinking. It generally depends on time for its well understanding (McPeck, 2016). Various students also depend on time for development of the important skills for critical thinking (Moore, 2013). The important steps of critical thinking are reflect, Question, Contextualize, evaluate, analyze and observe (Borglin Fagerstrm, 2012). Tools Required For Technical Critical Thinking Critical thinking is considered to be a fundamental factor for working scholarly. Various universities around the globe is responsible for teaching theses skills in form of some degree through some academics (Wallace Wray, 2016). Nowadays various universities have units that provide support to students in development of critical thinking techniques ( Wild Han, 2014). With the help of critical thinking process various students provide a clear idea which can help in the assistance of their analysis (Terry, 2012). There are certain factors that are included in critical thinking are analyzing of a problem with the help of written essay within a organization, learning of various problem, various case studies, various simulation, integrated learning of work through placement and practices. For example critical thinking in the field of health can be considered treating the various patients with proper medicine. The student must be familiar with the various working policies and ethics rela ted to it (Borglin Fagerstrm, 2012). Critical Thinking and Academic Writing Students have developed critical thinking techniques they just need to put these things in their readings and draw a conclusion from their course. Critical thinking is very helpful to students as it changes the way of reading from passive form to active form (Moore, 2013). Various universities round the globe also provides a large amount of resource for promoting of critical teaching technology in their journals of academic and newspaper article (Price Harrington, 2015). It also aims to provide students with variety of texts that aims to encourage direct learning in that point. It also aims to provide an opportunity for recognizing critical thinking in many domains (Borglin Fagerstrm, 2012). Critical Thinking and Academic Writing Students are capable of analyzing that what they have read they should start forming various formula which is considered as an important part of their written argument. It ultimately aims to provide critical thinking for their academic and assignment writing Yang Wu, 2012). Various universities round the globe has a list of question that the students can utilize while applying critical thinking techniques to their academic writings. It can help in framing the structure of question to promote critical thinking required for skill development (Cederblom, 2012). Assessing Critical Thinking During assessing of critical thinking various academic must return to the point that it needs certain. For ensuring robustness in the performance critical thinking must be taught to various students. There are certain step involved in critical thinking that are observing, Analyzing, Evaluating, Questioning, Contextualization and Reflection. Observe stage mainly involves in gathering of a number of resources or using resources from a variety of sources. Analyzing stage mainly consist of identifying all the important themes. Evaluation stage mainly focuses on identification of arguments that are needed for an opinion (Nosich, 2012). Questing stage mainly involves putting all the required question on the given topic. Contextualization phase mainly involves analysis and evaluation of the given context. Reflect phase mainly consist of various question that are posted. Both of the holistic and analytic rubrics are easily accessible for critical thinking. Analytic rubrics is generally considered as an important parameter for enabling a process which can mark an easy access to various parameters of critical thinking (Nosich, 2012). Various universities round the globe use a list of critical thinking rubrics. Rubrics can be used in various domains of critical like self assessment of critical thinking rubric and holistic critical thinking rubric. Critical thinking is generally considered in setting priority of outcome to higher education (Nosich, 2012). Critical thinking is considered to be important factor for free thinking and solving of problem in a better way in both lives that is professional and personal. Critical thinking can be considered as an important factor for examination of issue by breaking a problem into pieces and its evaluation in a proper way (Cederblom, 2012). Putting question with the answers to get a clear idea about the world around it focuses it to critical thinking. In various enquiry based instruction various teacher put questions where student can draw idea and conclusion about a topic. Critical thinking in writing can be considered as a new technique. Writing critical thinking converts a student from passive learner to active learner. With the help of writing technique student can use it to critically analyze various ingredient of critical thinking (Clifford, 2013). Employers from various organization look for fresh college pass out who have sharp and good critical thinking techniques that must be applied to various vocational based region. With the help of careful planning of task and activities, academics provide a important platform which is used for the development of critical thinking techniques in various students With the help of act of writing student can put their focus and thoughts before putting all their thoughts in the ir paper. As soon as the students are capable of analyzing that they have read they should start forming various formula which is considered as an important part of their written argument. Writing techniques gives a range of benefits to students. Opportunities for a group of people include decision, case studies, task relate work , reviews and various debate relate to it (Price Harrington, 2015). Students are generally exposed to different region for clarification of their ideas. Student response from various activities need thinking of new critical goals which are consider as an important parameter for students (Parkay, Anctil Hass, 2014). It is vital to put a clear idea for evaluation of critical thinking. Critical thinking helps in putting student and teacher towards a common target. It helps in evaluation of various skills and techniques used by various students and teacher from various industries. It helps in setting up of evidence, statements, graphics and question and also help in asking different questions, draw a conclusion from it , it also helps in explanation of assumption and various reasons. It is also important to note that it is an very important tool required for any course (Cederblom, 2012). It is very useful by students in any course of action so it can check the required criteria for it. It also helps in distribution of assignments that give freedom to st udents to receive guidance from various universities round the globe (Price Harrington, 2015).. This will ultimately improve the quality of work and it will ultimately improve the quality of their new idea and writing (Clifford, 2013). Conclusion Critical thinking can be used for addition of various activity of the scholar. It contains many skills that can be used for development of skills through time and experience. Students from various universities must be taken in account in many ways to facilate development of leaning outcomes. Employers from various organization look for fresh college pass out who have sharp and remarkable critical thinking techniques and skills which must be applied to various vocational based activities. Careful planning of task and activities in academics aims to provide a wonderful platform that can be used in the updating the critical thinking techniques of various students. Students can develop it further as a part of professional activities and learning of various lifelong techniques (Clifford, 2013). References Alsagoff, L., McKay, S. L., Hu, G., Renandya, W. A. (Eds.). (2012).Principles and practices for teaching English as an international language. Routledge. Arends, R. (2014).Learning to teach. McGraw-Hill Higher Education. Armstrong, G., Kotler, P., Harker, M., Brennan, R. (2015).Marketing: an introduction. Pearson Education. Borglin, G., Fagerstrm, C. (2012). Nursing students' understanding of critical thinking and appraisal and academic writing: A descriptive, qualitative study.Nurse Education in Practice,12(6), 356-360. Cederblom, J. B. (2012). Critical reasoning: Understanding and criticizing arguments and theories. Clifford, J. (2013).Returns. Harvard University Press. Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century.Thinking Skills and Creativity,12, 43-52. Fairclough, N. (2014).Critical language awareness. Routledge. Halpern, D. F. (2014).Critical thinking across the curriculum: A brief edition of thought knowledge. Routledge. Jackson, D., Chapman, E. (2012). Non-technical skill gaps in Australian business graduates.Education+ Training,54(2/3), 95-113. Kim, K., Sharma, P., Land, S. M., Furlong, K. P. (2013). Effects of active learning on enhancing student critical thinking in an undergraduate general science course.Innovative Higher Education,38(3), 223-235. Liu, O. L., Frankel, L., Roohr, K. C. (2014). Assessing Critical Thinking in Higher Education: Current State and Directions for Next?Generation Assessment.ETS Research Report Series,2014(1), 1-23. McPeck, J. E. (2016).Critical thinking and education. Routledge. Moore, T. (2013). Critical thinking: Seven definitions in search of a concept.Studies in Higher Education,38(4), 506-522. Nosich, G. M. (2012). Learning to think things through: A guide to critical thinking across the curriculum. Parkay, F. W., Anctil, E. J., Hass, G. (2014).Curriculum leadership: Readings for developing quality educational programs. Prentice Hall. Price, B., Harrington, A. (2015).Critical thinking and writing for nursing students. Learning Matters. Terry, D. R. (2012). Assessing critical-thinking skills using articles from the popular press.Journal of College Science Teaching,42(1), 66. Wallace, M., Wray, A. (2016).Critical reading and writing for postgraduates. Sage. Wild, J. J., Wild, K. L., Han, J. C. (2014).International business. Pearson Education Limited. Yang, Y. T. C., Wu, W. C. I. (2012). Digital storytelling for enhancing student academic achievement, critical thinking, and learning motivation: A year-long experimental study.Computers Education,59(2), 339-352.